Purcell and Elmslie, Architects Firm active: 1907-1921
Minneapolis, Minnesota :: Chicago,
Illinois |
Editor's Note: Yes, this is a blog. Some webs call this the "What's New" page. I jot down informal musings about what discoveries came to hand as I added material, and reminisce about the twenty-plus years of experience along the Path. These Grinds are and always have been intended to be very personal, off-the-cuff notes made for myself, mostly, as a way to keep perspective on my own experience, knowledge, and understanding in the Caravan. In short, while there are archival references and anecdotal reports sprinkled about here and there, much said here in the Grinds falls in the category of foggy reminiscence, speculation, or opinion. Have fun. |
A chair, somewhere in space |
|||
Stand Up
and Dance. Lest you
think that the journey in the Caravan ever becomes stale, there are always
surprises to lighten the mind and inspire the heart. Witness the above
chair. Recently a descendant of Purcell wrote to me attaching several images
of something that is wholly new to my eyes and, I suspect, most everyone
else's at this point. Let the celebration begin! The family history of this
piece says that it derives from the Minnesota era, when it was made by
William for Edna as a reading chair. That would mean it was originally in
Lake Place and survived the train wreck that took out so many precious
objects when the Purcell family was relocating from Pennsylvania to
Portland, Oregon. Visually in favor of this origin is the typography of the
lettering; also, the same dark mahogany wood was favored for the lamp that
would have stood next to it in the living room, as well as the "surprise
point" chairs for the writing nook and elsewhere in the vicinity. The Rose
Valley house in Pennsylvania was more of a cabin affair, and furnished with
ordinary commercial wooden chairs and tables, so this piece would have been
wholly out of place there. There is the possibility of having been made
for Georgian Place in Portland, Oregon, but the form is so much of the 1910s
that origin seems much less likely. |
|||
Reading chair for Edna S. Purcell Purcell & Elmslie, architects Source: Private collection |
Edna S. Purcell, sitting by the fireplace in Plain Jane Circa 1914 Source: Images, University of Minnesota Libraries Note: The mural by Charles Livingston Bull and the additional wood trim have not yet been added, so this photograph can be dated prior to 1916, yet after 1914 because of the presence of the little child's bench. Recognizing that small piece of furniture is essential for understanding the sense of family as a function of living beauty that the Purcells meant to create in their home. As yet it has not been restored to Lake Place by the Minneapolis Institute of Art, even though pretty much the same amount of photographic evidence exists as for the cube-shaped chairs which were re-created. |
||
The only "easy" or "reading chair" visible in the
archival photographs is a Plain Jane whose traditional lines have always
jarred with my sense of the living room at Lake Place. Since there are
no drawings of this newly revealed chair in the Purcell Papers, we can
only take as a starting point the family report of this piece
originating in Minnesota -- however visually compelling that may be.
While a detailed investigation is beyond the resources of a Grind, we
can do some sleuthing through the available imagery. Living room, with Plain Jane waiting for a suitor, and the early cube shaped chairs Edna S. Purcell residence 1915 This photograph can be affirmatively dated as after 1915 because the "Chicago River" painting by Albert Fleury is seen hanging above the tall lamp. This image is also interesting for the presence of a carpet, likely brought down from the dining room, overlaying the regularly present one in order to to effect a greater sense of width. The narrowness of the room does not rest well with the camera lens. The image of the living room taken for the Minnesota 1900 book is a most unfortunate example. The photographer brought down an old Oriental carpet from the upstairs bedroom and laid it like a zebra stripe across the open field of the living room rug. I was astonished that the museum would publish such an error in judgment, but it was an illumination of the same depth of field issue in photographing the room to which Purcell & Elmslie responded in the above image. Some things are just meant to be experienced in person, rather than facsimile. |
|||
Chair Minnesota Phonograph Company 1915 Note: The feet are now missing their bottom pad blocks. Two factors sway toward the Lake Place theory. First, there was an accounting number (#256: Edna S. Purcell residence, alterations, decoration, furniture ) issued to a furnishings project undertaken for the house in 1915. The results of this project can be studied through the extensive correspondence with the various artists and craftsmen who undertook the various elements of this work, and that information then correlated with the available archival photographs to determine the point where this chair may possibly have been manufactured. The notes accompanying the adjacent images indicate this trail. Second, there is
only one other chair form similar to the one in question. P&E furniture,
like other of their designs, tends to run in stretches of
continuity. There are periods of tall rectangular back chairs, for
example, characteristic of the 1910-1914 period, then shorter triangular
back shapes that appear from 1914 to 1917. Compare the cube-shaped
chairs that appear in the earliest Lake Place photographs with those
done for the Director's Room of the
Merchants National Bank in Winona, Minnesota. Lake
Place and the bank were on the drafting board at the same time in 1912. |
Chair and sofa Minnesota Phonograph Company From The Western Architect, July __, 1915.
Variations on a theme, the version in Lake Place having a solid back panel and lacking the ball feet. My feeling is that the Winona chairs were slightly smaller in size, too, as they were for a different, more intermittent use. They are tight to sit in, encouraging formal upright attention, and not comfortable for lounging, or even extended visiting, as the chairs in Lake Place would presumably have been intended to be. The reproductions presently in Lake Place fess more toward the Winona chairs. My impression from being in them is that they are under scaled. However, the originals are long since vanished, so the only tangible comparison available to the craftsman was the bank chair and old photographs taken with the distortion of a wide angle lens. Perhaps irrelevant now, anyway, as they are merely for gallery eye candy and no one uses them as living things. |
||
As it happens, the only similar form to the William/Edna piece is a
chair made for the sales room of the
Minnesota Phonograph Company, whose position in the
accounting sequence is #258. The forms are not identical, either. The
sides and back of the William/Edna chair are upholstered with fabric,
whereas the Edison Shop chairs are solid wood -- something more durable
for a commercial public space. The tapering foot pads of the
William/Edna chair are decidedly more delicate, too, than the block pads
of the sales room chair. However, the chairs for the other Edison Shops
in Chicago, San Francisco, and Kansas City are quite different; only the
chair for the Minneapolis location has resemblance to the William/Edna
piece. With these considerations, the production of the chair for Lake
Place appears to be probable, and thus aligned with the oral history.
Since the Purcells purchased art and executed new furniture over a three
year plan, it could well be that this reading chair was a very late
production given the refinement of the form. There may still be final
photographic proof in situ remaining yet in private hands, which are
said to be looking, so the jury is still out. This matter deserves better study than a quick news report in the Grind, but I thought to mention these factors as we passed by. Ultimately there are still great moments of happy discovery left to be encountered along the way. Many furnishings from other P&E interiors remain unaccounted for, as well, if they continue to exist, most notably, the furniture from the Kansas City and San Francisco Edison Shops, the Alexander Brothers executive offices, the exquisite Millar pieces (which are likely still in the possession of the family). And there is likely a lot more beyond that; many Parabiographies entries refer to furniture being made whose location, if surviving, is presently unknown. I am now examining this record in detail, making a list, and checking it twice, to determine what else might conceivably be out there. Whether any of these things can be tracked down, who knows? And then, there is always the possibility of another surprise email. On the other hand, I have been
approached numerous times over the decades by antique
dealers who wanted my imprimatur on objects that clearly were not by
P&E. Best to avoid that bog. |
|||
Front elevation, showing porch addition and front entrance J. S. Ulland residence, alterations Marion Alice Parker Purcell and Elmslie Fergus Falls, Minnesota 1916 Photograph © 2007 by Tom Shearer. All rights reserved. Team, Reprise.
A graduate student in art history has completed a master's thesis on
Marion
Alice Parker, a key Team member, and I am still going through the work.
However, it is good to note that academic research is now focused on those
contributors to the P&E office beyond the principals. |
|||
Front door panel J. S. Ulland residence, alterations Marion Alice Parker Purcell and Elmslie Fergus Falls, Minnesota 1916 Photograph 2007 by Tom Shearer. All rights reserved. |
As has been
pointed out by another very competent (and female) architectural historian, it is true that Marian
Mahony Griffin did not receive the level of attention to which she was
deserving at the time as a first tier player on the field. Yet it is not as simple
as pointing to her gender and saying boorish males ignored her. I think
it is a much more complex an issue than that, the enormous respect I
have for her work notwithstanding. Certainly her talent was a potent
presence in the Wright studio and when together with her husband, Walter
Burley Griffin, she clearly was a determining factor in the work of their own
joint practice. She was right there on the cutting edge when it mattered.
There are few presentation drawings by others in the progressive
movement that even begin to convey the transcendent charge present in
hers, done on silk like gossamer crystals of thought. She lived longer
than many of her colleagues and like
Purcell was she, too, could have been a voice across the International
Style wilderness. And I think she wanted to be, too, but was too
overwrought to be articulate. In truth, she seems to have been a bit
distraught later in life, which made communication with her problematic on
some levels. Her "Magic of America" manuscript,
the main written delivery of her thoughts, is difficult to follow even though profound at
its core. Purcell said it needed to be cut by two-thirds and it still
was still going to be more metaphysical (Read: Anthroposophical woo-woo) than architectural in focus. She does
appear to be, at least to my eyes, well served by H. Allen Brooks in the
seminal and still primary Frank Lloyd Wright and his Midwest
Contemporaries. In any event, I look forward to spending some time with the new assessment of Parker. I have read once through the manuscript, but this contribution deserves some meditation and not a drive by review. What is best and good without question is the addition to the knowledge base, and the connection of her early years in Minnesota with her final ones as part of the handicraft arts colony in Laguna Beach, California. Establishing a framework of continuity, including the odd (as in the sense of one-off, how did it get there?) production of a house in Fort Collins, Colorado, synthesizes streams of information that were previously disconnected. This thesis resolves some uncertainties propagated because of limitations in earlier source materials and promotes significantly the study of Marion Alice Parker. New, heretofore unknown details are now to hand. On balance the Caravan seems well served. As I say, however, for more comment than that I want to spend enough time to honor rightly the effort spent by the graduate student. And, perhaps, marshal one or two disagreements toward arguments that attribute heavier design participation in some P&E commissions to Parker just because her initials are on construction documents. Those kinds of drawings come late in the conceptual game, and were often referred to as "tracings," which lends an eye to the earlier generative function of sketches now perhaps missing from the assessable evidence. |
||
Carry on. Speaking of the Caravan, the origin of the term with Louis Sullivan, neatly encapsulating the union of both companionship and continuity, is noted by Purcell in one of three new essays that have been added to the "Review of Gebhard Thesis" that continues to be a major time sink to transcribe, yet a worthy one. | |||
The new texts concerning George Elmslie
are:
|
William Gray Purcell, sitting at his grandfather's writing desk Westwinds, 1964 Photograph by Dorothy O'Brien |
||
A portion of Part II was
already there, but has since been completed. While some scholars may
dismiss Purcell as an unreliable source (I think without a lot of
specific justification, too, just a perpetuation of impression) or
dispute his opinions about the interactions between Elmslie, Louis
Sullivan, and the evolution of capacity that characterized their
association, Purcell has the undeniable advantage of delivering first
person testimony. Yes, he was young, right out of college. Whatever his
ability to judge through the worshipful passions of a true believer, he
was a constant detailed observer of life -- something his writings reveal
indisputably. His attention to qualities and characters, woven here in a review that
performs more as a testament, is unique in the available source
materials. Although he wrote these essays filtered through a half
century of retrospection, there is still a sense of wonder and
immediacy, of pride and honor in being there, that comes through from
the original moment. While many manuscripts have been added here on
Organica as time
progressed, I think these essays are among the most substantially useful
to those interested in the relationship of Sullivan to both P&E and the
development of progressive design intentions in general. If nothing
else, they point the reader to numerous avenues of inquiry for
productive further
reading. There are another forty or so pages left to type, and these
include insertions by Purcell of correspondence bearing on the Gebhard
draft, and also Elmslie's lament over abuse by Purcell. I will get those
up. Further additions to the site will be listed on the "What's New" page, something like the "inventories of keystrokes" that the Grind started out as over six years ago. |
|||
Not coming up. The nature of Organica, and the appearance of these little Grinds, is now changing. For years now I have been mired in a variety of health and wealth issues that interfered with my wishes for things to go well. Having encountered the teachings of Eckhart Tolle, I am finding myself drawn more to what can be done in this moment, rather than projections for moments which never come. One result of this is a great difference in the life of this web site. While I will no doubt continue to clean things up here as I notice them, I am shifting much of my available energy into recoding the HyperFind system from which electronic access to this material originally descends. At some point, my intention is for this version of Organica to be archived, and the updated HyperFind version to replace it. I am also reading a huge pile of literature and revisiting every research document as I index them in the automation system. I appreciate the many e-friendships and e-colleagues that have come out of these writings, and I hope they remain active. For now, though the Caravan always goes on, this is the Grinder, signing off. |
Historical Grindstones
The More Amusing, Memorable, and Perhaps Insightful Grinds
The Chronological Perspective
|